The SSAG is concerned that some members of the community are becoming anxious about comments in the Springdale Response to Submissions (RTS). Hopefully, we can shed some light on these comments to dispel the fears that the RTS has created.

It’s important to bear in mind that the consultants that prepared the EIS and RTS are working for the developer.

These are just two of the issues that have come to our notice so far.

Firstly, on page 31 it states, ‘Given that more submissions were received in support than in objection, the proponent believes there is significant community support for the Project.’

This comment is misleading.

The determination of a project is not based on the most number of supporters or objectors.

The submissions for this project came from not only the local area but also other regions of NSW, as well as interstate. SSAG sought clarification from the DPIE on how submissions are evaluated. While the DPIE reviews every submission, more weight is given to the issues raised in submissions from the local community.

Based on the submissions lodged, there was only three (3) Sutton residents that supported the development, which refutes the claim of ‘significant community support’.

The other is on page 1, which states, ‘A total of 239 submissions were received by DPIE including four duplicates’.

The below image is taken from the DPIE website which shows there was a total of 247 submissions lodged for the project.  Removal of the four (4) duplicate leaves 243 submissions, not 239.

While the community doesn’t get an opportunity to formally respond to the Springdale RTS, the SSAG will continue to review the document and will be compiling a list of all the issues we believe should be made known to the DPIE for taking into consideration in the assessment process.  

If you find anything that you believe should be added to our list please send us an email contact@suttonsolaractiongroup.com.

If there is anything that is causing you concern please contact the SSAG so we may assist.